<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Robert Bradley&#039;s Re-Search Website &#187; Area Effectively Swept</title>
	<atom:link href="http://re-search.org.uk/keywords/area-effectively-swept/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://re-search.org.uk</link>
	<description>The bloke that knows sh!t loads of dead cool stuff about search...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:45:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Calculating Probability of Detection in  Search and Rescue</title>
		<link>http://re-search.org.uk/2010/02/09/calculating-probability-of-detection-in-search-and-rescue/</link>
		<comments>http://re-search.org.uk/2010/02/09/calculating-probability-of-detection-in-search-and-rescue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 07:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Bradley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Area Effectively Swept]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPS Track]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Koopman's Exponential Detection Function]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Optimal Search Problem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[POD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Probability Density]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Probability Density Distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Probability of Detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sweep Width]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Track Length]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://re-search.org.uk/?p=633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wrote a couple of weeks ago about how to calculate a probability density distribution for a missing person search. This was the first element of the optimal search problem. The second element is to be able to calculate the probability of detection. There have been numerous articles and methodologies proposed in the past. Most [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://re-search.org.uk/2010/02/09/calculating-probability-of-detection-in-search-and-rescue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coverage</title>
		<link>http://re-search.org.uk/2010/01/22/coverage/</link>
		<comments>http://re-search.org.uk/2010/01/22/coverage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 07:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Bradley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SAR Dictionary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Area Effectively Swept]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Koopman's Exponential Detection Function]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[POD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Probability of Detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Theory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://re-search.org.uk/?p=525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Coverage as a word is often used to describe how much of a search area or sector has been searched. This is wrong. Coverage has a specific mathematical definition in search theory. It refers to the Area Effectively Swept divided by the Area of the Search Sector.  This figure is then used in Koopman&#8217;s Exponential [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://re-search.org.uk/2010/01/22/coverage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

