Posts Tagged ‘BST’

Qualified Search Technician

December 9th, 2009

I’ve had this discussion a few times with people and I thought it was about time I put pen to paper and put it out there for debate.

I was disappointed a few years back when ALSAR officially dropped the word “basic” from the Basic Search Techniques course (now known officially as the Search Technicians course!) It somehow made it sound as if, by doing a weekend course, you could become “qualified” to search and seemingly know it all!

Well, as everyone knows, most BST courses clearly state that this is just the beginning and that you need to learn a whole lot more, and gain a whole lot more experience to really become a useful SAR TECH [to import the American phrase.]  So why pretend that the course is not just a basic guide; enough to get you started.

One of the things being discussed at UKLSI is whether we need to signpost more where the new “Search Technician” should go with their training. Whilst the majority of us hate “badges” with a passion, most of us seemed to agree that having a route to becoming a “qualified” search technician would be an extremely useful thing; both for Units and for individuals new to lowland search.

So what is the skill set of a “qualified” search technician?

BST course, obviously.

Skilled at Navigation?

A basic level of First Aid?

At least Track Aware, if not a Tracker?

Water Safety Trained?

Understanding of Dogs? Search Management?

Specialised Area of Search, such as Mountain Bikes, or Kayaks/Boats?

At least this would offer newcomers a basis to judge their skill set against. It might also guard against those coming into lowland search who seem to thing that they know it all, after six months at it.

Well, it’s over to you; I’m sure you have some thoughts.

  • Share/Bookmark

Search exercise planners handbook – Part Six

November 24th, 2009

How many clues can you find?

I often hear of search exercise planners and Training Officers trying to add motivation to an exercise by ensuring that there are loads of clues dotted around for teams to find. There are two comments I have regarding this practice;

One; In the lowland search environment it is extremely rare to find clues that are useful to the search management team. Why? Because the environment we search in is generally well-trodden already. There are no lack of potential clues in any urban, sub-urban or even rural setting in most places in the UK. Everywhere you go you will find discarded clothing, litter, drinks cans and so on – none of which is useful, as the SMT cannot tell if it is the mispers or not. Compare this to a search in the wilderness of the US, where few people have been in the last year/two/ten years!

The one potentially useful clue in our environment is track and sign, which can, with a skilled tracker, be given a useful time frame – Passed here in the last couple of hours or the grass would have totally sprung back up, walked here before/after the rainfall six hours ago and so on. This is doubly so if there is a comparison print available, or even shoe type & size.

The second comment I have upon using clues for exercises is that it reinforces the wrong behaviour. Searchers are “rewarded” for finding every clue, not finding the missing person quickly. As such searchers have tended to search closer together and slower – sweeping up everything in their path. This is done to the detriment of the overall search effort and success of the search. [Greater information on why this is so can be found in the paper, Spaced Out Searchers]

Care needs to be taken then, when deciding whether or not to use clues in any exercise. Generally, my advice would be, if in doubt don’t put any out!

This is even more important when searchers are being assessed – either for their basic search techniques course, team leaders or re-assessment. I would want to know that the individual could search for a misper, NOT find and sweep up litter!

Return to Search Exercise Planners Handbook Index

  • Share/Bookmark