I’ve had this discussion a few times with people and I thought it was about time I put pen to paper and put it out there for debate.
I was disappointed a few years back when ALSAR officially dropped the word “basic” from the Basic Search Techniques course (now known officially as the Search Technicians course!) It somehow made it sound as if, by doing a weekend course, you could become “qualified” to search and seemingly know it all!
Well, as everyone knows, most BST courses clearly state that this is just the beginning and that you need to learn a whole lot more, and gain a whole lot more experience to really become a useful SAR TECH [to import the American phrase.] So why pretend that the course is not just a basic guide; enough to get you started.
One of the things being discussed at UKLSI is whether we need to signpost more where the new “Search Technician” should go with their training. Whilst the majority of us hate “badges” with a passion, most of us seemed to agree that having a route to becoming a “qualified” search technician would be an extremely useful thing; both for Units and for individuals new to lowland search.
So what is the skill set of a “qualified” search technician?
BST course, obviously.
Skilled at Navigation?
A basic level of First Aid?
At least Track Aware, if not a Tracker?
Water Safety Trained?
Understanding of Dogs? Search Management?
Specialised Area of Search, such as Mountain Bikes, or Kayaks/Boats?
At least this would offer newcomers a basis to judge their skill set against. It might also guard against those coming into lowland search who seem to thing that they know it all, after six months at it.
Well, it’s over to you; I’m sure you have some thoughts.