<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Robert Bradley&#039;s Re-Search Website &#187; R Robe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://re-search.org.uk/keywords/r-robe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://re-search.org.uk</link>
	<description>The bloke that knows sh!t loads of dead cool stuff about search...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2011 06:43:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Probability of Detection (POD)</title>
		<link>http://re-search.org.uk/2010/01/08/probability-of-detection-pod/</link>
		<comments>http://re-search.org.uk/2010/01/08/probability-of-detection-pod/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 07:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Bradley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SAR Dictionary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Koester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D Cooper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Frost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Koopman's Exponential Detection Function]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[POD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Probability of Detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R Robe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sweep Width]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://re-search.org.uk/?p=409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Probability of Detection refers to the likelihood of a search resource finding the object they are searching for if it was in the area they were searching. Thanks to Koester, Cooper, Frost and Robe&#8217;s 2004 study we can now safely say that it is impossible to subjectively estimate POD. No more should we hear supposed Search Managers [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://re-search.org.uk/2010/01/08/probability-of-detection-pod/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

