<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Robert Bradley&#039;s Re-Search Website &#187; Search Research</title>
	<atom:link href="http://re-search.org.uk/themes/search-research/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://re-search.org.uk</link>
	<description>The bloke that knows sh!t loads of dead cool stuff about search...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:45:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Will the police be downgrading missing person calls?</title>
		<link>http://re-search.org.uk/2011/05/09/will-the-police-be-downgrading-missing-person-calls/</link>
		<comments>http://re-search.org.uk/2011/05/09/will-the-police-be-downgrading-missing-person-calls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 05:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Bradley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACPO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jan Berry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missing Person]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police Cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reducing Bureaucracy in Policing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://re-search.org.uk/?p=874</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Following on from my posts on the effects of police cuts on missing person search and Geoff Newiss&#8217;s post on police cuts I felt the need to do more research. Sometimes I wish I didn&#8217;t bother&#8230; Here is a quote from a Home Office Report from last year that I had missed until now &#8230; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://re-search.org.uk/2011/05/09/will-the-police-be-downgrading-missing-person-calls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What next for the Re-Search website?</title>
		<link>http://re-search.org.uk/2011/04/19/what-next-for-the-re-search-website/</link>
		<comments>http://re-search.org.uk/2011/04/19/what-next-for-the-re-search-website/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 07:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Bradley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Presentations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Training]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mental Health for SAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAR Websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Exercise Planners Handbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vulnerable Missing Person Search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://re-search.org.uk/?p=813</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m on holiday! You could be forgiven for not knowing as I have managed to write something for yesterday and today before I went off, but on holiday from writing I am. It did get me thinking though of where to go from here? Last week&#8217;s Mental Health for SAR week seemed to go well, as [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://re-search.org.uk/2011/04/19/what-next-for-the-re-search-website/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time to do more me SAR stuff &#8230; ?!</title>
		<link>http://re-search.org.uk/2011/04/08/time-to-do-more-me-sar-stuff/</link>
		<comments>http://re-search.org.uk/2011/04/08/time-to-do-more-me-sar-stuff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 07:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Bradley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UKLSI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://re-search.org.uk/?p=773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last night I resigned from UKLSI. This might have come as a shock to a few people, to a few others it was a long time in coming. As I explained in my resignation letter; &#8230; I am hoping to start a Phd later this year. I should have spent the last couple of months writing [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://re-search.org.uk/2011/04/08/time-to-do-more-me-sar-stuff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Psychic Search and Rescue</title>
		<link>http://re-search.org.uk/2011/04/01/psychic-search-and-rescue/</link>
		<comments>http://re-search.org.uk/2011/04/01/psychic-search-and-rescue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 07:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Bradley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychic Search and Rescue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychics and Missing Person Search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://re-search.org.uk/?p=757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yet again I return to the use of Psychics for looking for missing persons. As many of you know, in the past I have been very dismissive of their use. It is fair to say that I have used such words as Charlatans and Frauds freely when discussing the way I used to see them [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://re-search.org.uk/2011/04/01/psychic-search-and-rescue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Unifying Theory of Search</title>
		<link>http://re-search.org.uk/2011/03/24/a-unifying-theory-of-search/</link>
		<comments>http://re-search.org.uk/2011/03/24/a-unifying-theory-of-search/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 07:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Bradley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ALSAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawrence Stone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theory of Optimal Search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://re-search.org.uk/?p=730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What a grand sounding title for a post? I couldn&#8217;t think of another title that summed up what I was hoping to achieve with the post. I&#8217;d like to try to explain how all search is linked. Each type of search contains the same elements, but depending on their quantity / use depends on how [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://re-search.org.uk/2011/03/24/a-unifying-theory-of-search/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

